| Group Home | Forums | Articles | Members (2149) | Diaries | Videos | Leaders | Guidelines |
|
Lupus Community› Lupus Articles› Lupus Foundation Of America Achieves International Consensus On Definition Of A Lupus Flare
| Lupus Foundation Of America Achieves International Consensus On Definition Of A Lupus Flare |
|
|
| Written by fibroforever | |
| 19 January 2011 | |
|
Article Date: 11 Jan 2011
The Lupus Foundation of America (LFA) spearheaded a four-year worldwide initiative with more than 120 lupus
experts from 11 countries, the pharmaceutical and biotechnology
industries, and federal agencies, which resulted in the first-ever
global definition of a lupus flare. The development of Lupus Foundation of America Flare Definition (LFA-Flare) helps to overcome long-standing barriers to the development of new, safe, and more tolerable treatments for lupus.
For the past 15 years, many trials of new investigational
medicines for lupus have failed to show significant benefits for
patients. A consistent and meaningful definition for a lupus flare is
critical to evaluating the effectiveness of treatment over time. The
new definition will enable more precise outcome measures for future
studies, such as the number of flares or the time between flares. This
will have a positive impact on the quality and scientific basis of
clinical trials, which are required by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) to demonstrate the effectiveness of any new
therapy before it can be approved for general use in patients.
The consensus definition is: A flare is a measurable increase in disease activity in one or more organ systems involving new or worse clinical signs and symptoms and/or lab measurements. It must be considered clinically significant by the assessor and usually there would be at least consideration of a change or an increase in treatment. "This definition addresses several controversial issues about how we look at flares of disease, which may have been interfering with the accuracy of how we evaluate new treatments," said Joan T. Merrill, M.D., head of the Clinical Pharmacology Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, and LFA Medical Director. A paper describing the definition and the consensus process is now available online and will be published in the March or April issue of the medical journal LUPUS. LFA-FLARE has high face validity and now is ready for validation in clinical studies. The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC), a leading international consortium of lupus doctors, is evaluating this definition as a basis for modified outcome measurements of flare to provide an improved scientific basis for clinical trials. The LFA thanks the lupus researchers from universities and industry who contributed their expertise to this project. A worldwide effort such as this brings hope to millions of people around the world who are living with lupus that new medicines are on the horizon. The LFA's National Research Program, Bringing Down the Barriers®, is dedicated to addressing research issues that have for decades obstructed basic biomedical, clinical, epidemiological, behavioral, and translational lupus research. The LFA's approach to research is unique because it directs its funding to areas of research where gaps exist in the understanding of lupus, and to promising areas of study in which other public and private organizations have not focused their efforts. Using a three-pronged strategy, the LFA and its national network are committed to advancing the science and medicine of lupus by: directly funding research to close the gaps in lupus research; advocating for expanded investment in research from public and private sources; leading special initiatives; and forging collaborative efforts among stakeholders to address critical issues to advancing the science and medicine of lupus. For more information about the LFA's National Research Program, visit here. Source:
Lupus Foundation of America
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Important: Articles published in MDJunction are written by MDJunction's community members and not by medical professionals (unless stated directly). They are not medical articles/content and are not a replacement for medical diagnosis. If the article does not contain direct reference to the source of the data, please treat it as personal opinion of the writer.



